Tempe Distracted Driver Accident Lawyer

Arizona's Hands-Free Law: A.R.S. § 28-914

Arizona's hands-free law, A.R.S. § 28-914, makes it illegal to hold or support a phone with any part of your body while driving. Texting, scrolling, watching video, and holding a phone to your ear are all violations. Drivers may talk only through hands-free technology, such as Bluetooth or a mounted device.

The danger behind the statute is national. NHTSA reports that distracted driving claimed 3,208 lives in 2024. A glance at a screen takes a driver's eyes off the road at the worst moment: traffic slowing, a light changing, a pedestrian stepping out.

Phones are not the only distraction. Eating, reaching for objects, adjusting a touchscreen, and turning to passengers all pull attention from the road. The statute targets handheld devices, but any distraction can support a negligence claim when it causes a crash.

A citation under § 28-914 does more than fine the driver. In a civil claim, it becomes evidence that the driver broke a safety law at the moment of the crash. That evidence changes how an insurer values your case, and it opens the door to a stronger legal argument covered below.

How a Lawyer Proves the Driver Was Distracted

Drivers rarely admit they were texting. An attorney can subpoena cell phone records that show calls, texts, and data use in the seconds before impact. Timestamps that line up with the crash time are difficult for an insurer to explain away.

Witness observations carry weight too. A passenger, another driver, or someone on the sidewalk may have seen the driver's head down before the crash. Police body cameras and scene notes sometimes capture an admission, and Tempe officers cite § 28-914 when the evidence supports it.

Physical evidence tells its own story. No skid marks and no braking before a rear-end impact suggest the driver never saw stopped traffic. Many vehicles log speed and brake use in an event data recorder. A lawyer can move to preserve that data before the car is repaired or scrapped.

Adjusters know these proof sources exist. When a lawyer requests phone records early, the insurer must weigh the risk that a jury will see the timestamps. Cases often settle once that risk becomes concrete.

Nearby cameras help as well. Businesses along Rural Road and Broadway Road often have exterior cameras that record the moments before a crash. Footage gets overwritten in days, so preservation letters need to go out early.

Negligence Per Se: When Breaking the Law Proves Fault

Arizona recognizes negligence per se. When a driver violates a safety statute such as A.R.S. § 28-914, and the violation causes the type of harm the statute exists to prevent, the violation itself can establish negligence. Your attorney does not have to debate what a careful driver would have done.

This shifts the fight. Once distraction is documented, the dispute moves from who caused the crash to how much the damages are worth. Insurers understand the difference, and documented distraction cases carry real settlement leverage. The same logic applies to other statute violations, such as running a red light or driving impaired.

Comparative fault still applies. If the insurer argues you share blame, Arizona's pure comparative fault rule (A.R.S. § 12-2505) reduces your recovery by your percentage of fault instead of barring it. Even a driver who is 99 percent at fault can still recover the remaining 1 percent.

Where Distracted Driving Crashes Happen in Tempe

Distraction produces two signature crash patterns. The first is the rear-end crash: traffic slows, the driver's eyes are on a screen, and the car ahead gets hit at full speed. The second is the drift-over crash, where a vehicle slides out of its lane and sideswipes another car or strikes oncoming traffic.

Both patterns show up on Rural Road, Broadway Road, and US-60. Stop-and-go traffic on Rural Road near the ASU campus invites rear-end impacts from drivers glancing at navigation or messages. On US-60, higher speeds turn a brief glance into a long stretch of blind travel across the Superstition Freeway.

Known problem intersections such as Rural Road & University Drive and Broadway Road & McClintock Drive see frequent rear-end and left-turn crashes. Our guide to the most dangerous intersections in Tempe covers the full list. If you were hit from behind, our Tempe rear-end accident lawyer page explains how fault works in those cases.

Distracted drivers also hit people outside cars. Students crossing Apache Boulevard and University Drive on foot, bike, or scooter face real risk from drivers looking at screens. A pedestrian struck by a distracted driver has the same legal claim, often with far worse injuries.

Why Talk to a Tempe Distracted Driving Attorney Now

Phone records and vehicle data do not preserve themselves. Carriers keep detailed usage records for limited periods, and damaged cars get repaired or sold along with their data. An attorney can send preservation letters within days and lock the evidence down.

Arizona gives you two years from the crash date to file an injury lawsuit under A.R.S. § 12-542. Insurers use that clock against you, hoping you settle before the phone records surface. Our guide to dealing with insurance after a Tempe crash covers the tactics to expect.

Compensation can include medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. Arizona places no cap on compensatory damages in injury cases, a protection written into the state constitution (Ariz. Const. art. 2, § 31).

The consultation is free, and the attorney you are connected with can evaluate the distraction evidence in your case before it disappears. Bring your crash report number, photos, and any medical records you have. Call (623) 400-8417 any day between 9 AM and 9 PM.

Frequently Asked Questions