How a “Comparative Damages” Argument Can Change Your Tempe Crash Compensation

July 06, 20253 min read

You might think your Tempe car accident claim hinges only on who caused the crash. But that’s just the beginning. Once fault is established, how much you're owed can still be contested — and one of the insurer’s favorite tools is the comparative damages argument.

This tactic can dramatically reduce what you’re paid, even if the other driver clearly caused the collision. Whether your wreck happened on Southern Avenue or in Holdeman, knowing your rights after a crash in Tempe is key to protecting the full value of your injury claim.

What Is Comparative Damages?

Comparative damages stem from Arizona’s pure comparative fault rule. It allows courts and insurance companies to:

  • Assign a percentage of blame to each party

  • Reduce your compensation based on your share of fault

But beyond just determining fault for the crash itself, insurers often go a step further — arguing that you made your injuries worse, and therefore don’t deserve full compensation.

This is the essence of a comparative damages claim: “Yes, our driver hit you, but you could’ve reduced your injuries if you had done something differently.”

Real-World Examples in Tempe Injury Cases

Here’s what that looks like in action:

In each of these situations, the insurer might admit their driver caused the crash, but claim you’re partially to blame for the severity or length of your injuries. That allows them to cut your damages — sometimes by tens of thousands of dollars.

Why It’s So Effective for Insurance Companies

Comparative damages arguments shift attention away from the crash and onto your behavior after the fact. And many Tempe victims unknowingly play right into it by:

  • Skipping follow-up appointments

  • Ignoring pain until it worsens

  • Failing to take prescribed medication

  • Downplaying symptoms in early interviews

Even minor missteps can give insurers ammunition. And in high-value cases involving paralysis, pedestrian injuries, or rideshare crashes, they’ll look for any excuse to argue that you contributed to the final outcome.

What Arizona Law Says

Arizona courts allow defendants to argue that a plaintiff’s conduct contributed to the extent of damages, not just the occurrence of the crash. But they still have to prove it.

That’s where strong legal representation becomes critical. Your attorney can:

  • Present expert medical testimony

  • Show that your injuries would’ve occurred anyway

  • Disprove exaggerated claims about non-compliance or delay

In many cases, it’s a matter of narrative — and who presents the more credible version of events.

Can a Comparative Damages Claim Be Beaten?

Yes. But it requires:

  1. Fast, documented medical care — even for soft tissue injuries

  2. Compliance with treatment plans

  3. Clear communication with providers (and lawyers) about pain and limitations

  4. Legal strategy that preempts these arguments before they gain traction

If your crash happened in South Tempe, North Tempe, or anywhere near high-traffic corridors, the severity of the accident scene itself can also counter arguments about minimal damage or delayed care.

Don’t Let an Insurer Rewrite the Story

Comparative damages arguments let insurance companies pay you less by making your injuries your fault. Don’t fall for it.

If you were hit by a distracted driver or an uninsured motorist, your legal focus should be on documenting every aspect of your recovery — and making sure no one uses your healing process as a weapon against you.


Final Thought

The crash may be over — but the fight over what you’re owed is just beginning. Comparative damages arguments are subtle, but powerful. And without the right legal support, you might never know what the insurer is holding back.

Don’t let them shift blame for your injuries after the fact. Get ahead of their tactics — and protect the full value of your Tempe injury claim.

Back to Blog